“Location, Location, Location: Using a Claimant’s Phone Data to Verify an Alibi"

PropertyCasualty360
01.02.2020

Fred Ferrand HeadshotBrian Richardson HeadshotMurray Flint HeadshotIn an article published by PropertyCasualty360 on Jan. 2, 2020, partners Fred Ferrand and Brian Richardson, with attorney Murray Flint, provide insight on ways to unlock the power of smartphones as an investigative tool in identifying fraudulent claims.

Every claims professional and attorney who handles arson and fraud investigations has found themselves in a situation where all the facts presented seem suspicious and the insured has an unverifiable alibi. Oftentimes, receipts and bank statements may be requested to show an insured’s whereabouts, but even time-stamped receipts can — at best — show when a purchase occurred, leaving gaps in time between purchases.

Fortunately, smartphone data, which is now more accessible than ever before, has proven to be a useful tool in filling those missing gaps of time. Reviewing cellphone data during the insured’s examination under oath (EUO) can be a critical investigative tool that can help substantiate an alibi or expose a lie.

The attorneys explain the ways to use the cellphone GPS data during investigations, such as “phone extractions,” in which a substantial amount of data can be obtained from a device. The important consideration in these scenarios is how to request and obtain the information. In situations where the insured is uncooperative, the best course may be to obtain information about the phone during a recorded statement (phone number, whether they had the phone at the time of the loss, if they still have it) and leave it to the attorney to request it in an EUO notice and during the examination.

Although this information can be extremely valuable, it is important to consider it in the context of the claim and the state’s law. “It is also imperative to consider the technology’s limitations — for instance, some cellphone location data is only accurate to a certain distance and, therefore, the location data may not definitely prove the insured’s alibi or your defense,” explain the attorneys.

For the full article, please click here.

Practice Areas

Sign Up For Updates Subscribe to receive Swift Currie client communications.
Jump to PageX

Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek