The Clarks, “The Doll Test”, and Brown v. Board


Written by Alex McDonald, Attorney

In the 1940s and 50s, Drs. Kenneth and Mamie Clark designed a series of experiments to study the psychological effects of segregation on children. Known as “The Doll Test,” the Clarks used dolls with different skin colors to test the perceptions of black children aged 3-7. The telling results of these studies proved instrumental in the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education to reject “separate but equal”, the argument advanced in favor of legalized segregation.

Beyond Brown and The Doll Test, the Clarks were also trailblazers in the field of psychology. Kenneth and Mamie Clark were the first and second African-Americans, respectively, to receive PhDs in psychology from Columbia. Kenneth Clark was also the first African-American to serve as President of the American Psychological Association, the largest professional organization of psychologists in the country. The Clarks’ contributions also went beyond academics by founding the Northside Center for Child Development, a clinic in Harlem where Mamie Clark provided clinical counseling and psychological services from 1946 until her retirement in 1979. Northside Center has remaining up and running for 75 years.

Under The Doll Test devised by the Clarks, a child and the proctor sat together with four dolls, two black and two white. The proctor asked the child eight questions and recorded the responses:

1. “Give me the doll that you like to play with”;
2. “Give me the doll that is a nice doll”;
3. “Give me the doll that looks bad”;
4. “Give me the doll that is a nice color”;
5. “Give me the doll that looks like a white child”;
6. “Give me the doll that looks like a colored child”;
7. “Give me the doll that looks like a Negro child”; and
8. “Give me the doll that looks like you”

The results were shocking and demonstrated the detrimental effects of segregation on the most innocent and vulnerable in our society.

Most black children preferred the white dolls to black dolls. 67% said they preferred to play with the white doll and only 17% thought the white doll “looks bad”. By contrast, more than half of the black children indicated that the black doll “looks bad”. When asked to identify the doll that “looks most like you”, some of the children “broke down and cried” and 44% picked the white doll. In another aspect of the testing, the children gave the color “white” positive descriptions like “good” and “pretty” whiles saying the opposite about “black.” The results of the study showed both the stereotyping of blackness as inferior and the internalized stigmatization of black children beginning almost immediately.

The results also dispelled the widespread expectation that things would be different between children in the North and the South. They weren’t. The responses of children from integrated schools in Massachusetts were very similar to those in segregated rural Arkansas. Dr. Kenneth Clark concluded that “color in a racist society was a very disturbing and traumatic component of an individual’s sense of his own self-esteem and worth”.

The results of the Clarks’ Doll Test became one of the many tools in the NAACP’s legal strategy before the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board. Ultimately, the Clarks’ work and scholarship was cited in the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion as justification to overrule Plessy v. Ferguson and reject “separate but equal”: Racial segregation in public education was held to be unequal in violation of the 14th Amendment.

Learn more about the Clarks and the Doll Test here:

https://www.northsidecenter.org/about/ 

http://wayback.archive-it.org/8967/20171023214058/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/02/nyregion/kenneth-clark-whofought-segregation-dies.html 

https://www.mhanational.org/black-pioneers-mental-health 

https://www.naacpldf.org/ldf-celebrates-60th-anniversary-brown-v-board-education/significance-doll-test/ 

https://peacefulscience.org/articles/science-civil-rights-and-the-doll-test/ 

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/347/483.html#t11 

Jump to PageX

Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek